Latest stories
Digital, People, Smart & Co.

Utopia or the smart city of the future

What do Atlantis, Babylon, Ham­burg and Sant­and­er have in com­mon? Many people’s age-old desire and wish for a dif­fer­ent world, sym­bol­ised by myth­ic­al coun­tries and cit­ies as “legendary altern­at­ive worlds”. Regard­less of “wheth­er they go back to ancient legends (…) or are a mod­ern inven­tion, they have cre­ated streams of faith” accord­ing to Umberto Eco in his Book of Legendary Lands. [1] This refers to the legendary places of the past with all their splend­our and great­ness, their myths and uto­pi­as. But what about today?

In our digit­al world, new and sim­ul­tan­eously “intel­li­gent” cit­ies such as Ham­burg or Sant­and­er are pre­par­ing to write the next chapter in the his­tory of human desire.

Wel­come to the 21st cen­tury, wel­come to the smart cit­ies with their sup­posed splend­our and great­ness. The prom­ise and the dreams on which they are based are future solu­tions for the com­ing mega-cit­ies, the com­pre­hens­ive net­work­ing and digit­iz­a­tion of humans and machines. That sounds like hope for urb­an liv­ing space in today’s and tomor­row’s intel­li­gent city. Or is it just anoth­er uto­pia?

“What will be remembered about the twenty-first cen­tury more than any­thing else, except per­haps the effects of a chan­ging cli­mate, is the great, and final, shift of human pop­u­la­tions out of rur­al, agri­cul­tur­al life and into cit­ies.” That is how Doug Saun­ders describes things in the intro­duc­tion to “Arrival City” – he is refer­ring to the “one 21st-cen­tury devel­op­ment which will be remembered most clearly (…)”. [2] Saun­ders’ con­clu­sion picks up the fol­low­ing fig­ure from the “Edi­tion Le Monde dip­lo­matique” in its 2014 edi­tion entitled “Moloch, Kiez & Boulevard”: “Accord­ing to UN fore­casts, three quar­ters of the world’s pop­u­la­tion will live in cit­ies by 2050” [3], also because, in the opin­ion of many experts, the future lies in cit­ies; cit­ies all over the globe, on all con­tin­ents – from Moscow and Bom­bay to Tokyo and São Paulo. Expressed in fig­ures, that means: In 2050, 9.6 bil­lion people will be liv­ing on the Earth, 6.4 bil­lion of them in cit­ies.

An area of con­flict: mega-cit­ies and digit­iz­a­tion
The growth of mega-cit­ies causes sig­ni­fic­ant areas of con­flict in terms of polit­ic­al, pub­lic and social ques­tions. What answers can those respons­ible provide for future co-hab­it­a­tion in the ever more cramped space in mega-cit­ies whilst at the same time life forms are fully digit­al­ised and equally indi­vidu­al­ised. For some time, smart cit­ies togeth­er with their con­cepts and solu­tions have prom­ised a solu­tion.
Cur­rently, smart city appears to be more of a fash­ion­able term than a thought-through strategy which is lack­ing the neces­sary selectiv­ity in many places. Essen­tially, that requires a clear defin­i­tion and spe­cific­a­tion of the issue of the smart city includ­ing a com­mon approach for polit­ics, sci­ence and industry. Essen­tially, that requires a clear defin­i­tion and spe­cific­a­tion of the issue of the smart city includ­ing a com­mon approach for polit­ics, sci­ence and industry.

The digit­al con­trol
Mas­ter­ing data and digit­al­isa­tion is one thing. The uncurbed data col­lect­ing of some large con­cerns and also on the part of the state or increas­ingly fre­quent hack­er attacks are quite anoth­er. These require clear rules and more edu­ca­tion about the new digit­al world with its many prom­ises. The social psy­cho­lo­gist Prof. Har­ald Welzer speaks of these prom­ises in an inter­view on “Big data and the wretched prom­ise of sal­va­tion”. He asks: “What is this prom­ise?” He also provides the answer: “It only relates on its own part to the exist­ing sys­tem. It merely prom­ises that you will func­tion bet­ter with­in the sys­tem (…). The frame­work is always already set and it is just a ques­tion of arran­ging everything more ‘innov­at­ively’, a little bet­ter – by con­trolling one­self and every­one else.” For him, that means that Sil­ic­on Val­ley has a “fairly tired prom­ise of sal­va­tion” to offer.
And the Goethe-Insti­tut writes the fol­low-ing in an art­icle for “Who will build tomor­row’s cit­ies?”: Almost all smart city pro­jects do not involve cit­izens’ interests. “Smart city is a cent­ral­ist­ic top-down pro­ject led by large con­cerns which forces the hand of muni­cip­al­it­ies (…)”. And Welzer puts a name to com­pan­ies such as Google or Amazon.

What remains to hold on to? Will those respons­ible suc­ceed in filling the many gen­er­al­isa­tions with life? Can upcom­ing chal­lenges for urb­an life be bet­ter con­trolled, mastered and depic­ted trans­par­ently? This lat­ter in par­tic­u­lar appears to be needed urgent ly in the course of uncurbed data use and the asso­ci­ated data pro­tec­tion and inform­a­tion secur­ity con­cerns. For how we want to live should not be left solely to the large con­cerns’ data col­lect­ors and ana­lysts. There is more at stake, namely the gen­er­al wel­fare of all cit­izens. And they have con­cerns, wishes and expect­a­tions of a world – also aside from total digit­al­isa­tion. If the count­less advoc­ates of the digit­al­ised and net­worked city do not suc­ceed in identi­fy­ing clear courses of action, the smart city will remain a uto­pia. Per­haps some­thing which many people desire. For, as Welzer pro­nounces, “Someone who gets into an autonom­ous vehicle and who lets his house con­trol the tem­pera-ture itself and his smart­phone order the saus­ages even before he is hungry does not want just relief but relent­less dom­in­a­tion.”

Ger­man Sum­mary
Uto­pia oder die smarte Stadt der Zukun­ft
Willkom­men im 21. Jahrhun­dert, willkom­men in den Smart Cit­ies mit ihr­em ver­meint­lich neuen Glanz und ihr­er Größe. Das Ver­sprechen und die Träume dah­inter: Zukun­ftslösun­gen für die kom­menden Megastädte, eine umfassende Vernet­zung und Digit­al­is­ier­ung von Mensch und Maschine.

[1] Eco, Umberto: Die Geschichte der legendären Länder und Städte. München 2015.
[2] Saun­ders, Doug: Arrival City. München 2011, S. 7.
[3] d’Aprile, Dorothee: Die Stunde der Städte. In: Moloch, Kiez & Boulevard. Le Monde dip­lo­matique, 2014, Nr. 14, S. 3.


By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.